Skip to main content
Astreon Systems

Advice for defence medical planning, readiness, surge, and medical governance.

We work where broad advisory teams usually miss the technical detail: casualty load, evacuation, treatment capacity, staffing, supply, readiness, governance, and surge. The output is a short set of options, the assumptions behind each one, the evidence used, and the risk that remains.

Sectors
Defence medical; health authorities; critical care
Engagement
6-16 weeks; on-site, remote, or embedded
Outputs
Options, assumptions, model, risk, briefing pack
Availability
Selected engagements through 2026
What we do

Problems we take on.

Typical questions: Can the service absorb demand? Where does capacity fail? What should be funded first? Who owns the risk? What can leadership approve?

01 · Design

Health services design

Design the structure, staffing, interfaces, and capacity needed for a medical or health service to meet demand.

02 · Assessment

Readiness assessment

Measure doctrine, equipment, personnel, training, sustainment, and governance against the demand the service must absorb.

03 · Operating model

Operating model development

Define roles, decision rights, command relationships, escalation paths, and patient or casualty flow.

04 · Planning

Investment planning

Sequence what to build, what to fund, what can wait, and what risk remains.

05 · Assurance

Governance & assurance review

Test who owns the risk, who sees the evidence, who can intervene, and what assurance is missing.

06 · Analysis

Operational analysis & wargaming

Stress-test plans against demand, enemy action, degraded conditions, resource limits, and time pressure.

How the work runs.

We start by writing down the question the engagement has to answer. Then we collect evidence, test options, write the recommendation, and hand over the material needed to explain or update the work.

01

Frame

State the question, audience, deadline, constraints, and risk tolerance.

02

Assess

Collect demand, capacity, readiness, dependencies, and failure points.

03

Model

Compare options against doctrine, resources, timelines, known gaps, and sensitivity to assumptions.

04

Design

Produce the operating model, laydown, governance changes, or investment sequence.

05

Hand over

Provide the model, assumptions, evidence log, and briefing pack.

The assessment, in one view

Readiness gaps, ranked by risk.

Each domain is scored against a named standard and the demand it must meet. The output is a ranked list of gaps, evidence, owners, and actions required, not a heatmap for its own sake.

IllustrativeExample only. A real assessment uses your evidence, standards, and target date.

Readiness Assessment6 domains · gap to target
Overall index
68/ 100
Domains assessed
6domains
Gaps to close
6of 6
Target horizon
Q42026
DomainCurrent vs targetScore
DoctrinePlans & policy78-2
EquipmentMatériel & supply64-11
PersonnelManning & skill71-9
TrainingCurrency & exercise58-12
SustainmentLogistics & resupply66-12
GovernanceAssurance & control73-9
CurrentTargetBaseline · 68/100 overall
Who brings us in

Who brings us in.

Our clients are accountable for health services where bad assumptions create clinical, operational, or governance risk.

01

Defence medical organisations

Casualty estimates, force health protection, evacuation, treatment capacity, and sustainment for large-scale operations.

Operational medicalForce healthNATO-aligned
02

Health authorities & ministries

Capacity, workforce, emergency care, reform, and surge planning across a jurisdiction.

System designCapacityReform
03

Critical-care institutions

Hospital and network resilience: critical services, staffing, escalation, infrastructure, and demand spikes.

ResilienceSurgeOperating model

What we deliver.

You should be left with the recommendation, the assumptions, the evidence, the risk, and the material needed to explain it.

Independent by default

We carry no product or vendor stake. The recommendation is the one the evidence supports, whether or not it leads to more work for us.

No vendor stake

Doctrine and standards

We use the doctrine, standards, and staff language your organisation uses every day.

AJP-4.10 · APP-23

Evidence over assertion

Findings tie back to data, modelling, interviews, observed practice, or named assumptions.

Modelled · sourced

Handover included

You receive the model, assumptions, evidence log, briefing pack, and instructions for updating the work.

Method handed over
Begin an engagement

Send the question, deadline, and audience.

Include what must be decided, the deadline, audience, sector, and constraints. We will reply directly with what we would produce, or say if it is outside our work.

Begin an enquiry